4 min read

7 Signs Your Planning Process Is Costing You Margin

Weak planning rarely shows up as a line on the P&L. It hides in freight, overtime, write-offs and short deliveries. Here are seven signs to look for, and how to check each one.
7 Signs Your Planning Process Is Costing You Margin

Nobody gets a line on the P&L called "poor planning".

The cost is there, but it is spread across other lines. It is in freight, because you sent a half-empty truck to fix a short. It is in labour, because the line ran a Saturday shift. It is in write-offs, markdowns and short-delivery penalties. Each one looks like a small, separate problem with its own explanation.

Added together, they are often one of the biggest controllable costs in a mid-sized food business, and nobody owns it.

Here are seven signs that your planning process is quietly taking margin, and a simple way to check each one.

1. Forecast accuracy is reported as one number

If the monthly report says forecast accuracy was 92%, ask: 92% of what?

A total across the whole range hides almost everything that matters. In the Nerd Foods dataset, the six-week forecast was 92% of actual demand in total. Underneath that, one product was forecast at nearly double what it sold and another at half. The overs and unders cancelled out in the total, and the headline looked fine.

The factory does not make a total. It makes individual products in individual pack sizes. Accuracy that is only good at the top level is not good accuracy.

How to check: Ask for forecast error by SKU for the last three months, sorted from worst to best. If nobody can produce it, that is the finding.

2. Expediting is part of the weekly routine

Overtime on the line. An extra truck on Friday afternoon. Air freight for a raw material that should have been ordered three weeks ago. Every business has these occasionally. The question is whether they are the exception or the operating model.

Expedite costs are the most direct way planning failures turn into money. They rarely get reported together, because they sit in different cost centres.

How to check: Pull overtime hours, premium freight and urgent purchase orders for the last quarter and put them on one page. Then ask how many were caused by something genuinely unforeseeable, and how many by a plan that was not followed or not made.

3. Promotions end in write-offs

The promotion goes well. Sales are strong. Then, three weeks later, there is a pallet of stock in the corner nobody wants, and a month after that it is being sold through a clearance channel or written off.

It happens because the build is planned for the best case and nobody plans the exit. In the Nerd Foods data, every carton written off in two years came from a single promoted product, in the weeks straight after a promotion. Five of its seven promotions ended that way.

How to check: List your last ten promotions. For each, compare what was built with what sold, and note what happened to the difference. If you cannot easily answer the second part, the leftovers are probably costing more than you think.

4. The production schedule changes every day

A schedule that is rewritten every morning is not a plan. It is a reaction.

Every unplanned change costs something: a changeover that was not needed, a run cut short, a batch made in the wrong order, a raw material pulled forward. Some changes are justified. But when the schedule for the next three days is never settled, the line is spending its capacity on chasing rather than making.

How to check: Compare the schedule for next week as it stood on Monday morning with what was actually run. Count the changes. If more than a handful of lines moved in the final few days, there is no frozen window, and there should be.

5. Sales and operations are working to different numbers

Sales has a budget. Finance has a forecast. Operations has a production plan. Procurement is buying to something else again. All of them were right at some point, and none of them agree now.

When the business runs on several numbers, every function protects itself. Sales asks for more stock just in case. Operations builds buffer because it does not trust sales. Procurement buys extra because nobody told it about the range change. The business pays for all of that caution twice: once in working capital, and again when the excess is written off.

How to check: Ask sales, operations and finance separately for their volume number for next quarter. If you get three different answers, you do not have a sales and operations planning process, whatever the monthly meeting is called.

6. Every product has the same stock target

"We hold two weeks of cover." It is simple to explain, simple to measure and wrong for almost every product it is applied to.

A steady, high-volume product that you make every few days needs far less buffer than that. A lumpy, promoted product with a long lead time needs far more. A flat rule over-stocks the predictable lines and under-stocks the volatile ones, and you end up out of stock and overstocked at the same time.

How to check: Look at how your stock targets are set. If the answer is one number for everything, or nobody is sure, the targets are almost certainly costing you money at both ends.

7. Short deliveries are explained, not prevented

When a customer order goes out short, there is always a reason. The customer ordered late. The supplier was short. The line broke down. Each explanation is true.

But if service failures are reviewed one by one and closed with an explanation, the pattern never gets fixed. Some retailers' trading terms penalise short and late deliveries, and repeated failures cost shelf space and ranging conversations. Those costs are much harder to win back than a freight bill.

How to check: Take the last 20 short-delivered lines and group them by root cause. If most of them trace back to the same two or three causes, those are planning problems, not bad luck.

How many did you tick?

None of these signs on its own means the planning process is broken. Every business has some of them some of the time.

But if three or more sound familiar, the cost is almost certainly bigger than it looks, because it is spread across lines that nobody adds together. The good news is that most of the fixes are process and discipline, not new systems.

This is exactly the ground a Planning Health Check covers. I look at your forecast, stock, schedule and service data, work out where the margin is going, and give you a short list of what to fix first. If a few of these signs hit home, get in touch and we can talk through what you are seeing.